Know Your Vessel – Case studies in steering clear of sanctions evasion
What’s inside?
Global trade financing is an increasingly complex task for financial institutions, especially when vessels are involved. Many authorities now expect financial institutions to implement sophisticated controls when it comes to shipping. These include screening and monitoring for potential sanctions violations, trade-based money laundering, and other high-risk transactions.
Recently, the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) put out a new advisory describing common deceptive shipping practices. It also recommends a list of due diligence procedures for organizations across the maritime ecosystem to implement.
Given the large volume of transactions and the need for timely processing of transactions, it is not feasible to complete Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) on every transaction. Financial institutions must rely on a risk-based approach to protect themselves and keep their business on track.
Know Your Vessel: Case Studies in Steering Clear of Sanctions Evasion examines two public examples where standard screening tools failed to identify red flags associated with a vessel involved in a transaction and reviews the resulting risks to the transaction parties.
It goes on to explain how a Know Your Vessel (KYV) process such as considering the vessels’ prior behavior would have flagged the transaction. It ends by describing how KYV can be incorporated into the transaction screening process.
Â
Featured posts
IRAN WAR
April 2, 2026: Iran War Maritime Intelligence Daily
At a Glance Operational Overview Three of the four bulk carriers that exited on April 1 were Greece-owned and one China-owned. This signals that EU as well as Asia shipowners are negotiating at both diplomatic and commercial levels to use the permission-based system. Strait of Hormuz Transits Rise Sanctioned, Iran-linked tankers dominated inbound transits on…
April 1, 2026: Iran War Maritime Intelligence Daily
At a Glance Operational Overview 36% of transits seen March 31 were on US-sanctioned vessels, while 27% were Greece-owned bulk carriers shipping agricultural commodities to or from the Islamic Republic. This highlights how the selective blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is benefiting Iran. Strait of Hormuz Transit and Selective Denial Transit through the Strait…
One Month of War in the Gulf: Mapping the Global Maritime Disruption
At a Glance The First Month of the Iran War at Sea One month after the launch of Operation Epic Fury, the maritime system is no longer reacting to disruption. It is operating within it. The first days of the conflict triggered an immediate collapse in commercial confidence. Tankers halted, insurance coverage was withdrawn, and…
March 31, 2026: Iran War Maritime Intelligence Daily
At a Glance Operational Overview Transit through the Strait of Hormuz remains controlled rather than open, but throughput is increasing. On March 30, six AIS-transmitting vessels crossed the corridor, while additional movements likely occurred under partial or fully dark conditions. At the same time, vessel activity at Bandar Abbas provides visibility into how this system…
March 30, 2026: Iran War Maritime Intelligence Daily
At a Glance Operational Overview Global oil and maritime markets are now facing simultaneous pressure across three critical export nodes. The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed under selective IRGC-controlled transit. Ust-Luga has sustained its fifth UAV attack in seven days. Yanbu is operating as the primary alternative outlet for Gulf crude while facing a…
Week Four of the Iran War: A Maritime Intelligence Breakdown
At a Glance The Fourth Week of the Iran War at Sea Four weeks into the conflict, maritime activity is no longer defined by disruption alone, but by the emergence of a new operating model. The system has not stopped. It has adapted. The Strait of Hormuz is functioning under controlled access rather than open…