A guide on deceptive shipping practices

Deceptive shipping practices are tactics employed by bad actors to avoid detection and possible sanctions. But why are maritime stakeholders under the spotlight? The reason that regulators continuously shift increasing responsibility on due diligence towards the maritime ecosystem is because shipping plays a significant role in the global supply chain. This fact hasn’t been overlooked by regulators, as they. The recent advisory from U.S. authorities has, for the first time, detailed the responsibilities and expectations that private businesses connected to the maritime sector must adhere to.

OFAC numbered seven deceptive shipping practices that should be part of an effective compliance process. But simply knowing about them is not enough. How do you identify deceptive shipping practices with traditional matching tools? Well, you can’t. Bad actors today have become experts of their craft and the only way to keep up is with dynamic, AI-powered tools.

As trade sanctions increase, knowing which vessels you can safely do business with is of growing importance across the wider business environment. Today, it is not enough to “Know Your Customer” (KYC); you need to “Know Your Vessel” (KYV). And only strong tools are capable of identifying real-time risk factors at the vessel level.

We recently published a guide on exactly what executives need to know when it comes to deceptive shipping practices. Below are some key takeaways:

1. New decade, new standards – recent advisories published by U.S. and U.K authorities have raised the bar for players across the supply chain
2. Goodbye matching tools – Identifying deceptive shipping practices is drastically different from traditional sanctions list screening.
3. By analyzing vessel behaviors, organizations can proactively identify counterparties that may expose them to sanctions risk.

A sophisticated regulatory environment calls for a sophisticated solution. So what should you do? Onboard more tools and train more staff? The resulting costs and resources, without necessarily more accuracy, can outweigh the benefits. To help our partners manage at risk at scale, Windward automatically vets risk, while accounting for hundreds of risk factors in real-time. 

Get the guide to learn more.

Featured posts

IRAN WAR

April 27, 2026: Iran War Maritime Intelligence Daily

At a Glance Operational Overview  Maritime activity across the Strait of Hormuz and surrounding corridors remains active but uneven, with transit volumes fluctuating under continued enforcement pressure and operational uncertainty. Following the April 25 rebound, transit activity slowed again on April 26, despite maintaining full AIS visibility across all crossings. At the same time, Gulf-wide…

Read more

IRAN WAR

April 26, 2026: Iran War Maritime Intelligence Daily

At a Glance Operational Overview  Maritime activity across the Strait of Hormuz and adjacent corridors is showing early signs of recovery, but under sustained enforcement pressure and continued sanctions-driven disruption. Transit volumes rebounded on April 25 following several days of suppressed movement, with all crossings conducted under full AIS visibility. At the same time, U.S….

Read more

IRAN WAR

Two Weeks Into the Ceasefire: A Maritime Intelligence Breakdown

At a Glance The Second Week of the Ceasefire at Sea Two weeks after the ceasefire announcement, the maritime system has moved further away from normalization. The first week of the ceasefire established that Hormuz had not reopened to normal commercial traffic. Movement continued, but under overlapping Iranian control and U.S. enforcement. During the second…

Read more

IRAN WAR

April 23, 2026: Iran War Maritime Intelligence Daily

At a Glance Operational Overview  Maritime dynamics across the Strait of Hormuz and surrounding corridors continue to shift from constrained activity toward selective escalation, with enforcement, evasion, and direct engagement shaping vessel behavior. Iranian crude exports from Kharg Island declined sharply during the week of April 13–19, with total volumes estimated at approximately 3 million…

Read more

IRAN WAR

Iran War Exposes AIS Gaps and the Need for Multi-Source Intelligence

At a Glance The Iran War Exposed a Visibility Gap Operation Epic Fury did not stop maritime activity. It changed how that activity is conducted and how visible it is. From the outset, the electronic environment degraded at scale. More than 1,100 vessels were affected by GPS and AIS interference within the first 24 hours,…

Read more

IRAN WAR

Iran War and the Future of Chokepoint Control 

At a Glance From Open Sea to Controlled Passage For decades, global shipping has operated on a foundational assumption: freedom of navigation. The Iran war is challenging that assumption in real time. The Strait of Hormuz is no longer just congested or high-risk. It is controlled. Transit is selective, access is conditional, and movement depends…

Read more