A guide on deceptive shipping practices

Deceptive shipping practices are tactics employed by bad actors to avoid detection and possible sanctions. But why are maritime stakeholders under the spotlight? The reason that regulators continuously shift increasing responsibility on due diligence towards the maritime ecosystem is because shipping plays a significant role in the global supply chain. This fact hasn’t been overlooked by regulators, as they. The recent advisory from U.S. authorities has, for the first time, detailed the responsibilities and expectations that private businesses connected to the maritime sector must adhere to.

OFAC numbered seven deceptive shipping practices that should be part of an effective compliance process. But simply knowing about them is not enough. How do you identify deceptive shipping practices with traditional matching tools? Well, you can’t. Bad actors today have become experts of their craft and the only way to keep up is with dynamic, AI-powered tools.

As trade sanctions increase, knowing which vessels you can safely do business with is of growing importance across the wider business environment. Today, it is not enough to “Know Your Customer” (KYC); you need to “Know Your Vessel” (KYV). And only strong tools are capable of identifying real-time risk factors at the vessel level.

We recently published a guide on exactly what executives need to know when it comes to deceptive shipping practices. Below are some key takeaways:

1. New decade, new standards – recent advisories published by U.S. and U.K authorities have raised the bar for players across the supply chain
2. Goodbye matching tools – Identifying deceptive shipping practices is drastically different from traditional sanctions list screening.
3. By analyzing vessel behaviors, organizations can proactively identify counterparties that may expose them to sanctions risk.

A sophisticated regulatory environment calls for a sophisticated solution. So what should you do? Onboard more tools and train more staff? The resulting costs and resources, without necessarily more accuracy, can outweigh the benefits. To help our partners manage at risk at scale, Windward automatically vets risk, while accounting for hundreds of risk factors in real-time. 

Get the guide to learn more.

Featured posts

IRAN WAR

Iranian Exports Collapse as Enforcement Pressure Widens

At a Glance Operational Overview The June 1–4 reporting period highlights three parallel developments: Iranian exports are collapsing under blockade pressure, enforcement against sanctioned vessels is becoming more kinetic, and maritime control activity across Hormuz remains elevated. Iranian crude and condensate exports fell to 186,000 barrels per day in May, down 84% from April and…

Read more

BORDER SECURITY & INTELLIGENCE

Why Customs Enforcement Is Moving from Document Screening to Behavioral Intelligence

At a Glance The Screening Model Customs Was Built On No Longer Holds For most of the last twenty years, customs enforcement has operated on a screening model. Cargo manifests arrive ahead of port call, risk scores are calculated against the declared origin, shipper, and route, and anomalies trigger inspection. The model worked while the…

Read more

BORDER SECURITY & INTELLIGENCE

Why Behavioral Intelligence Now Defines Subsea Cable Protection

At a Glance From Monitoring to Prevention For most of the past decade, cable protection meant monitoring. Operators watched the screen, generated alerts when a vessel of concern appeared near a cable, and responded after the fact when damage occurred.  The threat landscape has shifted in ways that existing tools and protocols were not designed…

Read more

IRAN WAR

Hormuz Tightens as Iran’s Dark Fleet Stalls and Enforcement Widens

At a Glance A Parallel Enforcement Track Takes Shape in the Atlantic On the enforcement side, pressure on both Iranian and Russian shadow tonnage intensified across the same reporting cycle. The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a new Operation Economic Fury action targeting Iranian maritime extortion, expanding the cumulative enforcement track against Iranian shadow…

Read more

RISKS & COMPLIANCE

Who Is Really Responsible for Protecting Subsea Cables?

At a Glance A Responsibility Operators Did Not Choose Subsea cables now carry more than 95% of intercontinental data. They underpin the global financial system, the commercial cloud, defense and intelligence communications, and the AI infrastructure being built out at an unprecedented pace. Their importance is recognized, but their protection is not equally structured. Commercial…

Read more

RISKS & COMPLIANCE

Monitoring a Fleet You Can’t Find: The Marine Insurance Challenge in a Dark-Activity Era

At a Glance The Claims Environment Forced the Conversation The Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse did more than produce a market-defining loss. Howden Re’s revised assessment puts insured losses above $2.8 billion, cementing Baltimore as the largest marine insurance loss on record, surpassing the circa $1.6 billion Costa Concordia benchmark from 2012. The revised figure…

Read more