FTV Capital Completes Acquisition of Maritime AI Leader Windward

Read more

Whitepaper

5 Biggest Risks for Maritime Trade in 2025

New Risks Reshuffle the Deck

You can’t prepare for maritime trade risks that are not yet on your radar. 

Geopolitical and supply chain disruptions are occurring frequently and often seem to come out of nowhere – who predicted Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, or the Houthis’ disruption of the global supply chain in 2024? Who can be sure which country will be hit next in 2025 with the threat of a “Trump tariff”, instantly altering global trade routes and port congestion? 

In parallel to disruptions, deceptive shipping practices (DSPs) by bad actors have become more sophisticated and opaque. 

The regulatory landscape is seeing a constant introduction of new regulations and maritime sanctions, posing significant risks to trading and shipping organizations. Compliance is increasingly complex, with regulatory bodies intensifying their scrutiny on illicit trade practices, deceptive shipping tactics, and sanction evasion. Organizations have struggled to keep pace with these rapid changes.

New and evolving risks are already reshaping global trade flows, regulatory landscapes, and security protocols in 2025. To maintain resilience and agility, without compromising their bottom lines, organizations must accurately identify threats. 

This white paper explores the most urgent risks facing the maritime industry and how companies can proactively mitigate them. The challenge is to maintain an adaptive and dynamic approach to risk management without creating time-consuming and costly false positives – an approach that can quickly identify new risks, define them as such, generate leads, and monitor and respond to them.

1. The Strange Connection Between Undersea Infrastructure & the Shadow Fleet

Critical maritime infrastructure – including undersea cables, pipelines, and offshore rigs – has become an attractive target for sabotage, particularly for participants in geopolitical conflicts. Recent high-profile attacks have highlighted the vulnerability of global trade to disruptions in critical maritime infrastructure.

The increasing frequency of incidents has drawn the attention of the global trading, shipping, and supply chain ecosystems. There have been over 100 submarine cable damage incidents per year in recent years, according to Recorded Future, a U.S. cybersecurity firm. From November 2024 through February 2025 alone, four high-profile incidents were reported, emphasizing the urgency of this issue.

A geographic shift has also increased concern, as incidents have moved from the South China Sea to the Baltic Sea. At least 11 Baltic cables have been damaged since October 2023, including the severing of the C-Lion1 cable, which was Finland’s only direct link to Central Europe. These shallow-water sabotage operations are difficult to anticipate and prevent due to their speed and execution tactics.

CNN referred to critical underwater infrastructure as “Europe’s unexpected Achilles’ heel,” following a series of targeted incidents since 2022. If undersea data cables were disabled on a large scale, they could disrupt global communications, financial transactions, and security operations.

Shadow Fleet Involvement Complicates Detection 

As noted, an undersea power cable connecting Finland and Estonia experienced an outage. A ship, the Eagle S, docked in Ust Luga, Russia on December 23, 2024. It disabled its AIS signal for ten hours, reappearing two days later on December 25. That evening, the vessel sailed slowly above the undersea Estlink 2 power cable in the Gulf of Finland, coinciding with a sudden cable outage. This confluence of events has led to the vessel becoming a sabotage suspect. 

The Eagle S is just one of many vessels in Russia’s shadow fleet. According to Windward insights, over the past six months nearly 26,000 area visits to the Baltic Sea have been made by approximately 1,400 shadow fleet, or Russian-related, vessels. 

If the Eagle S was engaged in sabotage, it exemplifies the growing overlap between commercial and paramilitary operations. Is such a ship truly commercial, or covertly government-operated? 

This ambiguity is further complicated by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which allows freedom of passage for merchant vessels, but excludes intelligence gathering under Article 19, 2. (c). Proving breaches of innocent passage could lead to significant legal and operational consequences.

Shadow fleet ships present a dual threat: they may be evading sanctions, and/or targeting undersea infrastructure. Stricter monitoring and sanctions from port operators, insurance providers, and international regulators could be put into place as a precaution.

While governments must bolster independent capabilities to procure and act on maritime intelligence, energy companies can’t rely solely on state measures. 

Collaborative approaches involving the public and private sectors are essential to mitigate vulnerabilities.

This all comes against the backdrop of increased Western vigilance regarding Russia’s shadow fleet. 

A Politico article reports on these efforts: 

“Finnish authorities seized the Eagle S ship in December in an all-guns-blazing operation, suspecting it had sabotaged a subsea power link connecting Estonia to Finland. The detention of the ship – which was carrying 100,000 barrels of oil from St. Petersburg — was a galvanizing moment, and appeared to be a new front in a clandestine war between Russia and the West.

Now, European countries are holding behind-the-scenes talks on large-scale seizures of Moscow’s oil-exporting tankers in the Baltic Sea, according to two European Union diplomats and two government officials. They are also currently drafting new legislation to add legal heft to those efforts.” 

Windward’s Maritime AI™ platform shows more than 1,200 “shadow fleet or related” vessels that either engaged in dark activity, or a port call in the Baltic ports of Russia during the past 180 days (previous to February 10, 2025). Practically, most of them could be considered – based on the Eagle S case and on industry best practice analysis – a safety or security risk. 

To learn more, check out Windward’s white paper: Critical Maritime Infrastructure is the New War Frontier. 

The Role of AI in Critical Maritime Infrastructure Protection

Organizations can adopt an AI-powered solution to anticipate attacks, react quickly, and conduct thorough investigations afterward. The right solution would combine the power of cable-specific monitoring, behavioral analysis, customized risk, and instant alerts, for a fully automated critical maritime infrastructure protection solution. 

By integrating AI-driven risk assessment and surveillance technology, organizations can improve early detection, assess vulnerabilities, and respond proactively to sabotage or cyber threats.

Governments and private organizations are implementing new security measures, but monitoring vast areas of undersea infrastructure remains a challenge. The Russian shadow fleet and other covert actors exacerbates risks, making real-time tracking and early detection essential. Artificial intelligence provides an opportunity to enhance situational awareness and mitigate risks, helping to close the security and compliance overlap.

2. The Fastest-Growing Deceptive Shipping Practice

Location Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) manipulation is an increasingly pervasive issue in maritime trade, becoming more sophisticated and harder to detect. In 2024, location manipulation incidents surged by 52%, marking it as the fastest-growing deceptive shipping practice (DSP).

Location (GNSS) manipulation started as a widely used, military-grade technology adopted by navies, but it has since evolved to pose a significant threat to commercial global shipping and trade. 

Unfortunately, location (GNSS) manipulation, which often falls under the industry’s umbrella term “AIS spoofing,” has become common practice in the commercial market. The number of unique cases has grown exponentially since 2020, with over 3,300 cases involving nearly 1,000 unique vessels.

Location manipulation stands out among deceptive shipping practices due to its advanced technological nature. It features the use of a machine-generated location/path to disguise the true location of the vessel. Multiple methods have been identified to carry out this deception, including false transmission onboard the vessel and third-party onshore accomplices.

Traditional deceptive shipping practices are based on manipulating the information vessels transmit, making those practices relatively transparent. These include altering the vessel’s identities (MMSI and IMO), engaging in dark activity (lack of transmission), or frequently changing transmitted flags. 

Location (GNSS) manipulation is different. Bad actors continue to transmit data as usual, but they manipulate the information behind the scenes. This makes the vessel appear to be in a legitimate location, when it is actually somewhere else. Windward calls this phenomenon  “hiding in plain sight.” 

This sophisticated tactic allows bad actors to obscure their true movements and intentions without exposing themselves to reputational damage. Location manipulation complicates pre- and post-fixture processes, and efforts to enforce sanctions and regulations, because illegitimate vessels seem legit.

The 2025 Spoofing Challenge

Initially, the patterns generated by location (GNSS) manipulation were often obviously fake and easy to detect with the naked eye – the supposed vessel movements were physically impossible and made no logical sense. 

These early attempts at deception included perfect geometrical shapes, sharp turns, and vessels sailing for long periods against ocean currents (see the image below).

GNSS White paper Image 3

Much like deceptive practices identified and included in official advisories and regulations become outdated, bad actors quickly adapted to the known manipulation typologies and developed new tactics to evade detection and sanctions.

Already in early 2025, patterns have become increasingly sophisticated. So while the behavioral typologies model is still critical, without advanced technology and proper domain expertise, stakeholders can miss many new cases that do not align with any of the known behavioral typologies.

Addressing this challenge requires groundbreaking, agile technology that can quickly evolve in real-time. By leveraging deep learning models and years of domain expertise, the right vendor can move beyond reactive detection frameworks to create proactive models. 

These models will continuously learn and adapt to recognize real vs synthetic transmissions. Synthetic ones do not necessarily fall within the known typologies most current models know how to recognize. These models must be capable of cross-referencing multiple data sources – such as multiple AIS vendors and satellite imagery – and identifying nuanced patterns that indicate manipulation.

3. The Trump Tariffs: A New Trade War?

U.S. President Donald Trump imposed a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports into the United States at the time of the publication of this white paper. CNN notes:

“Although the United States gets most of its steel from Canada, Brazil and Mexico, the tariffs are largely — albeit indirectly — aimed at China.” 

Trump’s first few days in office saw a flurry of tariff tariff threats and legislation, leading some to label the situation a new “trade war.” 

Things are changing so quickly, it’s challenging to keep up! First, President Trump backed down Columbia with the threat of a tariff, getting the country to accept deportees.

Then Trump declared an economic emergency in order to place duties of 10% on all imports from China and 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada. Trump later suspended his tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada until at least March 1, 2025. 

Beyond policy debates and political maneuvering, the impact has already been felt across global shipping, supply chains, and commodity markets. The million dollar question: how can organizations remain ready and agile for the existing and coming disruptions?

Potential Impact This Year

Windward’s Maritime AI™ platform found more than 1,200 tankers that were involved in the Canada/Mexico –> U.S. energy trade routes, to give just one small example. These tankers called all relevant ports more than 19,500 times in the last year alone.

 

Top trends

The Council on Foreign Relations summarizes the monumental reshaping of global trade that could take place due to tariffs: “Nearly half of all U.S. imports—more than $1.3 trillion—come from Canada, China, and Mexico. However, analysis by Bloomberg Economics shows that the new tariffs could reduce overall U.S. imports by 15 percent. While the Washington, DC-based Tax Foundation estimates that the tariffs will generate around $100 billion per year in extra federal tax revenue, they could also impose significant costs on the broader economy: disrupting supply chains, raising costs for businesses, eliminating hundreds of thousands of jobs, and ultimately driving up consumer prices.” 

The tariffs are likely to prompt further shifts in manufacturing and sourcing strategies.

The maritime ecosystem will feel this impact almost immediately. Chinese ports such as Shanghai and Ningbo – currently among the busiest in the world – may see reduced U.S.-bound cargo volumes. Instead, alternative manufacturing hubs in Southeast Asia and India could experience growth. For example, Vietnam’s exports to the U.S. surged by 36% during the height of the U.S.-China trade war in 2019. A similar pattern is likely to repeat, further diversifying global shipping routes.

The geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China have already prompted many Chinese manufacturers to establish plants in Mexico, basically turning Mexico into a huge transshipment hub to maintain China’s market presence in North America – but President Trump’s threats against Mexico likely nullify this strategy. 

Trump’s tariffs are expected to accelerate supply chain diversification efforts, outside of Canada and Mexico. Companies reliant on China for manufacturing may increasingly look to “China+1” strategies, where production is distributed across multiple countries to mitigate risks. This strategy was more widely adapted pre-COVID. Diversification reduces vulnerability to geopolitical tensions, but it also introduces complexity. 

From a cost perspective, the tariffs are likely to raise shipping expenses, as longer routes and increased transshipments become necessary. For example, moving goods from Vietnam or India to the U.S. often requires additional transshipment points compared to direct shipping from China. These added layers increase costs, which may be passed on to consumers, worsening inflationary pressures.

Traders and shippers need to ensure that they understand how tariffs will affect pricing, the expected lengths of shipments, and the availability of vessels.   

And bunkering companies will want to know where the new hot spots are, as shipping and trade routes quickly evolve. 

4. Sanctions Will Shift Russia’s Trade Networks

The oil ban and price cap imposed on Russian oil led to a major shift in the oil supply chain. The most notable of these changes was the identity of Russian crude and oil product importers. With countries banning the import of Russian oil – including the U.S., UK, EU, Australia, and Japan – and the decline of Russian oil prices, other buyers emerged. Countries such as China, India, and Turkey significantly increased their trade with Russia. This led to the creation of a quasi-legal fleet working in parallel to the cleared fleet to carry out this trade. 

But in 2024, regulators and Western countries intensified their focus on third-party countries that previously served as intermediaries for Russian oil exports. Compliance crackdowns targeted key facilitators such as India and the UAE, meaning that Russia will likely search for new trade alliances in 2025.

Reuters described a pressure campaign against the UAE in May 2024: 

“The United States, Britain and the European Union are pressing the United Arab Emirates to show it is cracking down on firms evading sanctions imposed on Russia over the war in Ukraine, according to three sources aware of the diplomatic outreach.

American, British and EU officials visited the Gulf state last week as part of a wider coordinated effort to prevent sanctioned goods from reaching Russia, a British Foreign Office spokesperson said, declining further comment.” 

In parallel, U.S. Treasury sanctions on two Russian oil producers in January 2025 could dramatically impact India’s consumption of Russian oil, as reported in a CNBC article

“India’s days of buying cheap Russian oil could be over.

Sweeping sanctions by the U.S. against Russia’s energy companies and operators of vessels that transport oil will complicate Indian efforts to keep importing cheap Russian crude and could push up inflation in Asia’s third-largest economy, analysts said.” 

Around 40 percent of the newly sanctioned vessels have transported Russian oil to India. 

Meanwhile, Russian crews are working hard to obfuscate the real identify of their vessels: 2024 saw a 28% increase in ownership changes by Russian-affiliated tankers and major spikes in designated companies in the UAE (+189%), India (+3,100%), Liberia (+1,850%), and Panama (+700%). 

This trend is expected to persist, requiring enhanced vigilance from regulators and compliance teams on the next ownership hubs that may pop up in place of the targeted locations.

An AI platform can help traders and shippers better understand the origin of the cargo they are working with and how trade flows are changing, detect deceptive shipping practices, and stay on top of what is happening with the gray and dark fleets. Business intelligence can also mitigate risk for bunkering organizations and quickly spotlight new opportunities.

5. Heightened Scrutiny on Iran-Linked Vessels

Trump instructed the State Department to impose “maximum economic pressure” on Iran, including increased enforcement of existing sanctions. 

The Maritime Executive explains

“To carry out the ‘maximum pressure’ sanctions order, the State Department will issue guidance to shipping, insurance and port operators about the risk ‘to any person that knowingly violates U.S. sanctions with respect to Iran’ or an Iranian proxy. The department will also review, modify or revoke all sanctions waivers, and will work with the Department of the Treasury (which handles sanctions enforcement) on ‘a campaign aimed at driving Iran’s oil exports to zero.’ 

An estimated 150 tankers operate in Iran’s shadowy oil trade, and about 40 percent are currently sanctioned.”  

Following the passage of the SHIP Act, over 400 Iran-affiliated vessels were flagged for potential sanctions violations. And Windward found a notable 20% increase in liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) tankers within Iran’s fleet, signaling a shift in export tactics. Watch for this in 2025. 

Key Compliance Strategies

  • Comprehensive vessel screening: AI-driven tools can assess vessel histories and risk factors in real time
  • Behavioral monitoring: identifying deceptive shipping practices through pattern recognition and anomaly detection
  • Regulatory alignment: staying ahead of changing compliance requirements with automated updates and alerts.

Windward’s Tech Can Reveal & Reduce Risk

Risk is evolving and different types are emerging, causing cascades of new sanctions. How can global trading and supply chain organizations become proactive in this challenging environment?  

Windward can help! 

We work with potential and existing customers to understand their pain points and then jointly create a plan for how our AI technology can heal them. You can stay ahead by bringing AI and Gen AI into your workflows. 

Gen AI is changing the game and presents a tremendous opportunity for organizations that discover how to best integrate this technology into their existing systems and workflows. This will be necessary for a wide variety of reasons, including the frequent geopolitical changes. 

Windward offers MAI Expert™, the industry’s first maritime Gen AI agent, to optimize global trade and maritime risk management, automate screening and investigations, and promote business growth. It can integrate with your systems and workflows, creating greater efficiencies.  

You can also benefit from a configurable approach to risk with Organization Defined Risk. Early Detection, which is powered by MAI Expert™, enables proactivity, exposing the unknown unknowns and emerging trends.

See How AI Can Help!