A guide on deceptive shipping practices

Deceptive shipping practices are tactics employed by bad actors to avoid detection and possible sanctions. But why are maritime stakeholders under the spotlight? The reason that regulators continuously shift increasing responsibility on due diligence towards the maritime ecosystem is because shipping plays a significant role in the global supply chain. This fact hasn’t been overlooked by regulators, as they. The recent advisory from U.S. authorities has, for the first time, detailed the responsibilities and expectations that private businesses connected to the maritime sector must adhere to.

OFAC numbered seven deceptive shipping practices that should be part of an effective compliance process. But simply knowing about them is not enough. How do you identify deceptive shipping practices with traditional matching tools? Well, you can’t. Bad actors today have become experts of their craft and the only way to keep up is with dynamic, AI-powered tools.

As trade sanctions increase, knowing which vessels you can safely do business with is of growing importance across the wider business environment. Today, it is not enough to “Know Your Customer” (KYC); you need to “Know Your Vessel” (KYV). And only strong tools are capable of identifying real-time risk factors at the vessel level.

We recently published a guide on exactly what executives need to know when it comes to deceptive shipping practices. Below are some key takeaways:

1. New decade, new standards – recent advisories published by U.S. and U.K authorities have raised the bar for players across the supply chain
2. Goodbye matching tools – Identifying deceptive shipping practices is drastically different from traditional sanctions list screening.
3. By analyzing vessel behaviors, organizations can proactively identify counterparties that may expose them to sanctions risk.

A sophisticated regulatory environment calls for a sophisticated solution. So what should you do? Onboard more tools and train more staff? The resulting costs and resources, without necessarily more accuracy, can outweigh the benefits. To help our partners manage at risk at scale, Windward automatically vets risk, while accounting for hundreds of risk factors in real-time. 

Get the guide to learn more.

Featured posts

RISKS & COMPLIANCE

What the New OFAC-OFSI Comparative Overview Means for Maritime Sanctions Compliance

At a Glance The OFAC-OFSI Publication in Context The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and His Majesty’s Treasury’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) are the offices responsible for enforcing economic sanctions implemented by the United States and the United Kingdom, respectively. The two offices established the OFAC-OFSI Enhanced…

Read more

HORMUZ INTELLIGENCE

Hormuz’s Stalled Recovery: Two Strikes and Suspended Evacuation

At a Glance Operational Overview The Strait of Hormuz is technically open, but it is not functioning as commercial infrastructure. Two kinetic incidents in 72 hours, an IMO evacuation corridor suspended without a resumption date, and total daily transits averaging approximately 13, roughly 90% below pre-war levels, collectively describe a corridor that is open in…

Read more

ANNOUNCEMENTS & RELEASES

Introducing GPS Jamming Resilience: Cutting False Vessel Activity From Contested Waters

Windward is releasing GPS Jamming Resilience, a new platform capability that automatically identifies and suppresses the false vessel activity generated by GPS interference, before any of it reaches an analyst. It launches already proven. Since Operation Epic Fury began in late February, the capability has filtered more than 2.2 million false ship-to-ship (STS) meeting records…

Read more

HORMUZ INTELLIGENCE

IRGC Orders Vessels to Turn Back: The Southern Corridor Reversal Stalls the Hormuz Recovery

At a Glance Operational Overview A week of widening commercial confidence in the Strait of Hormuz has run into the first significant test of the post-MoU operating environment. On June 25, the IRGC published a Telegram claim that vessels in the southern corridor had been ordered to turn back, with Windward identifying five vessels exhibiting…

Read more

RISKS & COMPLIANCE

What Bunkering Operators Need to Know About the EU’s 21st Sanctions Package

At a Glance What the 21st Package Means for Bunkering The EU’s 21st sanctions package, proposed on June 9, 2026, introduces a structural shift in how Russia sanctions reach into the maritime services sector. Previous packages focused on sanctioning the vessels themselves, the entities operating them, and the financial institutions enabling the trade. The 21st…

Read more

RISKS & COMPLIANCE

GPS Jamming Is Breaking the AIS Data Compliance Teams Rely On

At a Glance The Compliance Problem That Did Not Exist Five Years Ago For two decades, AIS has served as the trusted backbone of maritime compliance screening. Banks screen counterparties using AIS-derived vessel histories. Insurers price policies and assess claims using AIS movement records. Charterers evaluate vessel KYC profiles using AIS-confirmed port call histories. Marine…

Read more